The Succession Challenge in Consumer & Retail: Are You Ready for the Next Wave of Change?

By Sara Höglund

If there’s one thing I’ve learned after years in consumer and retail, it’s that nothing stays still for long. Demand shifts before your quarterly forecast is even printed. Margins remain tight, and organisations are constantly adapting to new channels, new technologies, and growing sustainability pressures. Yet despite all this movement, leadership pipelines often remain worryingly thin.

 

I’ve seen it time and again: critical roles vacancies, and there are just a handful of internal candidates ready to step in. That gap between the pace of change and the leaders capable of navigating it isn’t just inconvenient, it’s risky.

 

Leading in this sector is no walk in the park. Today’s executives are expected to deliver commercial results, manage brands, pricing, distribution, and customer experience, and at the same time ensure operational resilience across supply chains, retail networks, and digital platforms. And on top of all that, they are guiding organisations through constant transformation.

 

Leadership gaps may not make headlines, but their consequences are real. Even short transitions slow strategic initiatives, disrupt operations, and create uncertainty across the organization. In retail, where speed, coordination, and brand consistency are non-negotiable, gaps in leadership can ripple through the business quickly. And yet, succession planning often focuses almost exclusively on the CEO and a handful of top executives, leaving the rest of the organisation exposed.

 

It’s no surprise that many companies turn to external hires when critical roles open. Bringing in new leaders can inject fresh ideas and skills, which is valuable. But relying too heavily on external talent is often a sign that internal development is falling behind. Building leaders from within requires commitment, structured programs, cross-functional experience, and long-term investment and work that pays off over years, not quarters.

 

Some of the companies I admire most have recognized this challenge. They identify high-potential talent early, give them operational exposure across the business, and create clear development paths for commercial and operational roles alike. They extend succession planning beyond the top tier.

 

Disruption in consumer and retail isn’t slowing down, and leadership continuity has become a strategic differentiator. The question for us is no longer whether change will continue; it’s whether we are developing leaders who can navigate it, sustain performance, and inspire confidence when the unexpected happens. Investing internal talent pipelines is not just a strategic choice; it’s a necessity. Companies that get this right won’t just survive change. They will define it.

 

One recent example that highlights this challenge comes from an ongoing collaboration with a major semiconductor manufacturer, where succession planning has become critical for business. As top talent is increasingly pulled into strategic initiatives and transformation projects, one question quickly rises to the surface: who is ready to step in when key leaders step away from their roles?

 

Working closely with the Nordic leadership team at this semiconductor manufacturer, we are helping build a stronger internal leadership pipeline while embedding the company’s leadership fundamentals throughout the process.

 

The assignment began with strategic alignment sessions together with the Nordic CEO for both Sweden and Norway, where we mapped the overall business direction, growth ambitions, and future leadership requirements connected to the company strategy. From there, we conducted structured interviews with leaders across functions to establish a clear current-state assessment of the organization, leadership capabilities, and critical competence gaps.

 

As part of the work, we developed and implemented a leadership and competence matrix to create a more transparent overview of existing capabilities, succession of readiness, and future potential across the organization. The matrix was used to identify key individuals, risk areas, leadership dependencies, and possible successors for business-critical roles.

 

In close collaboration with HR, we also reviewed historical succession planning and internal recruitment patterns to understand which competencies and leadership profiles had historically been prioritized, why certain decisions had been made, and where gaps still existed. Together, we identified what structures, behaviors, and processes needed to evolve to strengthen long-term leadership sustainability and internal mobility.

 

The outcome of this work has already resulted in several organizational adjustments designed to create better conditions for leadership to take greater ownership and accountability. This includes clearer mandates, increased autonomy within leadership roles, and stronger local decision-making capabilities — all directly connected to improving succession planning and long-term organizational resilience.

 

Within our assessment processes, we continuously evaluate not only current performance and leadership capability, but also the candidate’s projected ability to perform both short- and long-term. This includes assessing adaptability, learning agility, and potential readiness for expanded responsibility, leadership scope, or future role transitions within the organization.

 

The overall objective has been to move succession planning from being reactive and operational into becoming a strategic leadership tool directly linked to business growth, organizational stability, and future capability building across the Nordic organization.